Booth v. Neotti et al
| Michael J Booth |
| George Neotti, John Doe, R Bolding and T Armstead |
| 3:2010cv01236 |
| June 7, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Riverside |
| William Q. Hayes |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER: The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 44 ) is adopted in its entirety. The Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Michael Booth (Doc. 35 ) is granted. Plaintiff shall file the Second Amended Complaint attached to his motion (Doc. 35 -3) within ten days of the date of this order. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 4/16/2012. (mdc)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER: (1) Granting (Doc. 2 ) Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Imposing no Initial Partial Filing Fee and Garnishing Balance from Prisoner's Trust Account Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a); (2) Denying (Doc. 3 ) Motion f or Appointment of Counsel Without Prejudice Pursuant to 28 U.S.C §1915(e)(1) and Referring Case to San Diego County Volunteer Lawyer Program; and (3) Directing U.S. Marshal to Effect Service of Complaint Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 4(c)(3) & 28 U.S.C. §1915(d). Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 6/13/2010. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (IFP package prepared; documents mailed to Matthew Cate) (cap)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
