Windham v. Metropolitan Transit System

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Southern District Windham v. Metropolitan Transit System

Windham v. Metropolitan Transit System

Plaintiff:	James Windham
Defendant:	Metropolitan Transit System
Case Number:	3:2010cv01271
Filed:	June 15, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office:	San Diego Office
County:	San Diego
Presiding Judge:	Irma E. Gonzalez
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 16, 2010	Filing 26 ORDER finding as moot Defendant's 13 Motion for More Definite Statement; granting Defendant's 14 Motion to Dismiss; Postponing Ruling on Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Defendant's motion to dismiss is granted a nd Pla's claims against Dft are dismissed w/o prejudice. Dft's motion for a more definite statement is denied as moot. Court declines to rule on Pla's motion for appointment of counsel at this time. If Pla wishes to file an amended complaint, he should to so w/in 30 days of the filing of this Order. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 11/16/2010. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jah)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 16, 2010

Filing 26 ORDER finding as moot Defendant's 13 Motion for More Definite Statement; granting Defendant's 14 Motion to Dismiss; Postponing Ruling on Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Defendant's motion to dismiss is granted a nd Pla's claims against Dft are dismissed w/o prejudice. Dft's motion for a more definite statement is denied as moot. Court declines to rule on Pla's motion for appointment of counsel at this time. If Pla wishes to file an amended complaint, he should to so w/in 30 days of the filing of this Order. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 11/16/2010. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jah)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Windham v. Metropolitan Transit System
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Windham
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Metropolitan Transit System
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?