Maricich v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Annmarie Maricich
Defendant: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Inc. and DOES 1 to 10
Case Number: 3:2010cv01375
Filed: June 29, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: Solano
Presiding Judge: William Q Hayes
Referring Judge: William McCurine
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 0201 fl
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER granting #15 Joint Motion for Dismissal. The Plaintiff Annemarie Maricich's individual claims are dismissed with prejudice, and the claims alleged on behalf of the putative class are to be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 4/9/11. (lao) (av1).
April 4, 2011 Filing 15 Joint MOTION to Dismiss by Annmarie Maricich. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Aparajit Bhowmik)(Bhowmik, Aparajit) (mdc)
November 19, 2010 Filing 14 ANSWER to #13 Amended Complaint by Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Inc. (Visosky, Kathryn) (mdc)
November 4, 2010 Filing 13 (First) AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Annmarie Maricich. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service) (Blumenthal, Norman) Modified on 11/5/2010 - Added "First" to text; no new defts added. (mdc)
November 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting #10 joint Motion for Leave for Plaintiff to File an Amended Complaint. Defendant shall have thirty (30) days to answer after the entry of this order to file an Answer to the First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 11/3/2010. (tkl) (jrl).
November 2, 2010 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Aparajit Bhowmik on behalf of Annmarie Maricich (Bhowmik, Aparajit) (mdc)
November 2, 2010 Filing 10 Joint MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint by Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Inc., Annmarie Maricich. (Bhowmik, Aparajit) (mdc)
October 29, 2010 Filing 9 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge William McCurine, Jr: Case Management Conference held on 10/29/2010. Court to issue scheduling order.(CD# 10/29/2010 n/a). (Plaintiff Attorney Kyle Nordrehaug). (Defendant Attorney THomas R. Kaufman). (rab)
October 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SCHEDULING ORDER: On 10/29/2010, the Court convened a telephonic Case Management Conference. Any motion to join other parties, to amend the pleadings, or to file additional pleadings shall be filed on or before 11/30/2010. All other pretrial motions must be filed on or before 8/19/2011. The Memoranda of Contentions of Fact and Law are due by 11/21/2011. Objections to Pre-trial disclosures shall be filed no later than 12/5/2011. The Proposed Final Pretrial Conference Order is due by 12/5/2011. The Final Pretrial Conference is set for 12/12/2011 at 11:00 AM before Judge William Q. Hayes. Signed by Magistrate Judge William McCurine, Jr on 10/29/2010. (mdc) (jrl).
September 27, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER following ENE Conference. On September 22, 2010, the Court convened an Early Neutral Evaluation Conference. A telephonic Case Management Conference set for 10/29/2010 09:00 AM in Courtroom C before Magistrate Judge William McCurine Jr. Signed by Magistrate Judge William McCurine, Jr on 9/27/2010.(tkl) (jrl).
September 22, 2010 Filing 6 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge William McCurine, Jr: Early Neutral Evaluation Conference held on 9/22/2010(CD# 9/22/2010 n/a). (Plaintiff Attorney Kyle Nordrehauq). (Defendant Attorney Thomas R. Kaufman). (rab)
August 31, 2010 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Kathryn A. Visosky on behalf of Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Inc. (Visosky, Kathryn) (srm).
August 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE AND ORDER For Telephonic Early Neutral Evaluation Conference: The Early Neutral Evaluation Conference will be held telephonically on 9/22/2010 at 09:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge William McCurine, Jr on 8/16/2010. (mdc)(jrl).
August 13, 2010 Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Inc. (Kaufman, Thomas) (mdc)
June 29, 2010 Filing 2 Summons Issued (tkl)
June 29, 2010 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against DOES, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 15105.), filed by Annmarie Maricich.(mtb) (mam).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Maricich v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Annmarie Maricich
Represented By: Norman B Blumenthal
Represented By: Aparajit Bhowmik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Inc.
Represented By: Thomas Roy Kaufman
Represented By: Kathryn A. Visosky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1 to 10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?