Caravantes v. California Reconveyance Company et al
| David Caravantes |
| California Reconveyance Company, Washington Mutual Bank, FA, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Chase Home Finance LLC, Vrej Joukadarian, Clement J. Durkin, Deborah Brignac, Ann Thorn and DOES |
| 3:2010cv01407 |
| July 6, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Anthony J. Battaglia |
| Irma E. Gonzalez |
| Banks and Banking |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 53 Motion to Dismiss. The Court Denies Defendants motion to dismiss Plaintiffs cause of action for violation of California Civil Code § 2923.5; and Grants in part and Denies in part Defendants motion to dismiss Plaintiffs cause of action for violation of the UCL. Because Plaintiffs remaining UCL claims are his only claims asserted against Defendants Brignac and Thorn, the Court Dismisses with Prejudice Defendants Brignac and Thorn. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 12/22/11. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ecs)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER granting Defendants Deborah Bringnac, California Reconveyance Company, Chase Home Finance LLC, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, JP Morgan Chase Bank, and Washington Mutual Bank, FA's 20 Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint. Pla's 2nd and 5th causes of action are dismissed w/o prejudice. Pla's 4th cause of action is dismissed w/ prejudice. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 8/3/2011. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jah)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 11 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint. The following causes of action are dismissed w/ prejudice: 1.) 1st, 3rd, 15th and 16th causes of action as to Dft JPMorgan, 2.) 2nd cause o f action as to Dft JPMorgan, 3.) 4th, 5th, and 6th causes of action as to all moving Dfts. The following causes of action are dismissed with leave to amend: 1.) the 2nd cause of action for violation of RESPA as to all moving Dfts, 2.) 7th and 8th cau ses of action for civil conspiracy and unfair business practices, 3.) 9th, 10th, 11th and 12th causes of action for violations of RICO, and 4.) 14th cause of action for violations of Cal. Civ. Code 2923.54. Motion to Dismiss is denied as to the 13th cause of action for violation of Cal. Civ. Code 2923.5. If Pla wishes to file an amended complaint, he should do so w/in 21 days of the filing of this Order. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 10/14/2010. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jah)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER Denying as Moot (Doc. 2 ) Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause re Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 7/6/2010. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(cap)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
