Hasan v. Cates

Petitioner: Jawwaad M Hasan
Respondent: Matthew Cates
Case Number: 3:2010cv01416
Filed: July 6, 2010
Court: California Southern District Court
Office: San Diego Office
County: San Luis Obispo
Referring Judge: Bernard G. Skomal
Presiding Judge: Thomas J. Whelan
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 22, 2011 20 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER: (1) Adopting 19 Report and Recommendation, (2) Granting 13 Respondent's Motion to Dismiss, and (3) Denying Petitioner's 14 Motion for Appointment of Counsel and Evidentiary Hearing as Moot. Signed by Judge Thomas J. Whelan on 6/22/2011.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(knh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hasan v. Cates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jawwaad M Hasan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Matthew Cates
Represented By: Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?