Ritchie v. Sempra Energy

Plaintiff: Ramon Eugenio Sanchez Ritchie
Defendant: Sempra Energy
Case Number: 3:2010cv01513
Filed: July 20, 2010
Court: California Southern District Court
Office: San Diego Office
County: XX Outside US
Presiding Judge: Irma E. Gonzalez
Referring Judge: William V. Gallo
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1332fr Diversity-Fraud
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 1, 2010 12 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 4 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss: Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. If Plaintiff wishes, Plaintiff may file an amended complaint within fourteen days after this order is electronically docketed. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 12/1/10. (lmt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ritchie v. Sempra Energy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ramon Eugenio Sanchez Ritchie
Represented By: Kirk B Hulett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sempra Energy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?