Kennedy et al v. Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB et al
| Philip Frank Kennedy and Dana Lynn Kennedy |
| Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB, Aurora Loan Services, LLC and DOES |
| 3:2010cv01516 |
| July 20, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Ruben B. Brooks |
| Thomas J. Whelan |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
ORDER: (1) granting 19 Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice; (2) granting in part and denying in part Plaintiffs' Request for Judicial Notice; (3) granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss: Plaintiffs' claims are HEREBY DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. This Order concludes the litigation in this matter. The Clerk shall close the file. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 8/10/11. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(lmt)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER granting 6 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss: the Court grants Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' claims without prejudice and with leave to amend. If Plaintiffs wish to file an amended complaint, they shall do so within 14 days of the date that this Order is electronically docketed. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 11/2/10. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(lmt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
