Woods v. Romero et al
| Jamie L Woods |
| Romero, Larry Lyle, A Canlas, N Ridge, William Mosely, Russell, D McCarthy, Pangranuyen, F Sedighi and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Medical Department |
| 3:2010cv01562 |
| July 23, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| William V. Gallo |
| William Q. Hayes |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
ORDER (1) Granting Motion To Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Imposing No Initial Partial Filing Fee And Garnishing $350.00 Balance From Prisoner Trust Account (Re Doc. 2 ); (2) Denying Motion For Appointment Of Counsel (Re Doc. 3 ) And (3) Dismissi ng Action For Failing To State A Claim Pursuant To 28 U.S.C. Sections 1915(e)(2)(B) & 1915A(b): Plaintiff is granted 45 days leave from the date this Order is "Filed" in which to file a First Amended Complaint which cures all the deficienci es of pleading noted. If Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint still fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, it may be dismissed without further leave to amend and may hereafter be counted as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. S ection 1915(g). Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 9/30/2010. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service; Order electronically transmitted to Matthew Cate, Secretary CDCR; per Order, a blank 1983 Amended Complaint form also mailed to Plaintiff.) (mdc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
