Kopopelli Community Workshop Corporation et al v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al
| Kopopelli Community Workshop Corporation, Catherine Bryan and Betty Bryan |
| Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., MTGLQ Investors, LP, Quality Loan Service Corporation, DOES and ROES |
| 3:2010cv01605 |
| August 2, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Ruben B. Brooks |
| Dana M. Sabraw |
| All Other Real Property |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
107
ORDER denying Plaintiff Betty Bryan's Motion for Summary Judgment re 62 Motion. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on her claim for elder abuse in violation of California Welfare and Institutions Code § 15600, et seq, is denied. Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion 84 is Denied. Motion 71 is denied as moot. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 8/9/11. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(lao)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint by Defendants Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and Bill Koch and granting Stephen Wichmann's Motion to Dismiss with prejudice re 13 , 36 . Plaintiffs may file an amended Complaint consistent with this Order within 20 days after the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 2/22/11. (lao) (jrl).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
