Mitchell v. Small
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|April 24, 2012
AMENDED CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Court Dismisses the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus as untimely under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). The Court Issues a Certificate of Appealability limited to the issue of eq uitable tolling. See Lambright v. Stewart, 220 F.3d 1022, 1025 (9th Cir. 2000) (holding that a COA should issue where the questions are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further, and any doubts whether a COA should issue are to be resolved in favor of petitioner). (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ecs)
|March 29, 2012
ORDER adopting in part and declining to adopt in part the 28 Findings and Conclusions of United States Magistrate Judge; granting Respondent's 19 Motion to Dismiss; dismissing Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; and issuing a Limited Certification of Appealability. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 3/29/2012. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mtb)
|August 19, 2010
ORDER RE: FAILURE TO SATISFY FILING FEE REQUIREMENT AND FAILURE TO NAME PROPER RESPONDENT. Petitioner must, no later than October 5, 2010, (1) pay the $5.00 filing fee OR submit adequate proof of his inability to pay the fee; AND (2) file a Firs t Amended Petition which cures the pleading deficiencies outlined in this Order. Failure to do so will result in the dismissal of this case. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 8/19/2010.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service; Mailed Petitioner a blank motion to proceed in forma pauperis form and a blank first amended petition form)(jer)
|August 12, 2010
Notice Regarding Possible Failure to Exhaust and One-Year Statute of Limitations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal on 8/10/2010.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jer)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?