Ratliff v. Martel

Petitioner: Virgil Louis Ratliff
Respondent: M Martel
Case Number: 3:2010cv01705
Filed: August 11, 2010
Court: California Southern District Court
Office: San Diego Office
County: Amador
Presiding Judge: Marilyn L. Huff
Referring Judge: Louisa S Porter
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 9, 2012 140 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER Denying 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Adopting Report and Recommendation. The Court denies the petition with prejudice, and the Court denies Petitioners request for a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Marilyn L. Huff on 08/08/2012.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ag)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ratliff v. Martel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Virgil Louis Ratliff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: M Martel
Represented By: Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?