Arch Specialty Insurance Company v. Skandia Construction Services, Inc. et al
| Arch Specialty Insurance Company |
| Skandia Construction Services, Inc. and 1515 Partners LLC |
| 3:2010cv01764 |
| August 23, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Barbara Lynn Major |
| Barry Ted Moskowitz |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
CLERK'S JUDGMENT IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is Dismissed with Prejudice, including all counter and cross claims, with each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ecs)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER re 16 Motion to Dismiss and 30 Motion to Strike.Plaintiff's motion to dismiss is Granted in part and Denied in part. The seventh and eighth causes of action for bad faith action and breach of covenant of good faith are Dismissed as to Plaintiff Arch. The Court Srikes Defendants' allegation that Mr. Conklin and CCI are Arch's agent. See Counterclaim 83. Defendants have thirty days to file an amended complaint to cure this deficiency, if they so choose. All other claims remain operative. Defendants' motion to strike is Denied. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 7/25/11. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ecs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
