Burton v. Cate et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|March 1, 2012
ORDER: The (Doc. 32 ) Report and Recommendation is adopted in it entirety. Respondent's (Doc. 6 ) Motion to Dismiss is granted. Petitioner's (Doc. 20 ) Motion for Evidentiary Hearing is denied. The certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 2/29/2012. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (mdc)
|September 28, 2011
ORDER: The (Doc. 21 ) Report and Recommendation is adopted except for page 11 line 21 through page 13 line 26 regarding the reception center and page 20 line 23 through page 21 line 14 regarding an evidentiary hearing. Petitioner's (Doc. 9 ) M otion to Strike is denied. Respondent's (Doc. 6 ) Motion to Dismiss and Petitioner's (Doc. 20 ) Motion for Evidentiary Hearing remain pending. This matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge to further develop the factual record on the is sue of whether Petitioner suffered an impediment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2244(d)(1)(B) and whether Petitioner is entitled to equitable tolling for any of the period from 1/13/2007 to 7/27/2007. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 9/28/2011. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (mdc)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?