Burton v. Cate et al
Ralph Lee Burton |
Matthew Cate and Gerry Brown, Jr |
3:2010cv01797 |
August 27, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
Riverside |
Ruben B. Brooks |
William Q. Hayes |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 33 ORDER: The (Doc. 32 ) Report and Recommendation is adopted in it entirety. Respondent's (Doc. 6 ) Motion to Dismiss is granted. Petitioner's (Doc. 20 ) Motion for Evidentiary Hearing is denied. The certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 2/29/2012. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (mdc) |
Filing 25 ORDER: The (Doc. 21 ) Report and Recommendation is adopted except for page 11 line 21 through page 13 line 26 regarding the reception center and page 20 line 23 through page 21 line 14 regarding an evidentiary hearing. Petitioner's (Doc. 9 ) M otion to Strike is denied. Respondent's (Doc. 6 ) Motion to Dismiss and Petitioner's (Doc. 20 ) Motion for Evidentiary Hearing remain pending. This matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge to further develop the factual record on the is sue of whether Petitioner suffered an impediment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2244(d)(1)(B) and whether Petitioner is entitled to equitable tolling for any of the period from 1/13/2007 to 7/27/2007. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 9/28/2011. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (mdc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.