Cardenas et al v. Whittemore et al
| Joseph Cardenas, Machelle Cardenas and El Paseo Grande, LLC |
| Robertson Whittemore and DOES |
| 3:2010cv01808 |
| August 30, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
| Thomas J. Whelan |
| All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
121
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; and ORDER OF JUDGMENT: In light of the determinations of fact and conclusions of law, the Court finds for Plaintiffs on both the claim for declaratory relief, and the claim for trespass. The Court Awards Plai ntiffs $1.00 in nominal damages for trespass, against Mr. Whittemore individually. The request for injunctive relief is Denied as unnecessary. The Court Orders as Moot the Motion to Amend Complaint. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendants, and to terminate the case. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 3/8/2013.(leh)
|
|
Filing
115
ORDER granting 101 Unopposed Motion in Limine to exclude testimony of David Van Atta. The motion in limine is granted and the testimony it describes is Ordered excluded. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 2/8/13. (lao)
|
|
Filing
97
ORDER denying plaintiffs' 92 Motion for additional discovery, for leave to amend, and for leave to move for summary judgment. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 1/18/13. (kaj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
