Porter v. Howard et al
Samuel K Porter |
Muabe Howard, Hernandez, Unknown, and CDCR/IA |
3:2010cv01817 |
August 30, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
Imperial |
Peter C. Lewis |
Janis L. Sammartino |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 194 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Court approves and adopts 192 Report and Recommendation in its entirety and grants Defendants' 150 Motion to Dismiss. Clerk directed to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 8/29/2014. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jah) |
Filing 122 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Court adopts 106 Report and Recommendation in full. Granting Dfts' 76 Motion to Dismiss. Because Court agrees w/ the Report and Recommendation's findings that "allegation of other facts c onsistent w/ the challenged pleading could not possibly cure the deficiency", namely Pla's failure to exhaust his administrative remedies, Court dismisses w/ prejudice the Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 7/10/2012.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jah) |
Filing 89 ORDER: (1) denying 80 Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel; (2) granting 82 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time and Setting Briefing Schedule as 76 Defendants' MOTION to Dismiss; (3)denying 85 Plaintiff's Motion for Continuance; and denying 87 Plaintiff's Motion to Stay: Plaintiff must file his Opposition on or before 12/12/11. Defendants must file any reply by 12/19/11. The hearing date of 11/8/11 is VACATED. The matter will be submitted on 12/27/11 at 10:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter C. Lewis on 10/27/11. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(lmt) |
Filing 64 ORDER ADOPTING 57 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Defendants' 27 motion to strike is DENIED, Defendants' 27 motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Any amended complaint SHALL BE FILED within 31 days of the day this order is electronically docketed. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 7/29/11.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(lmt) |
Filing 59 ORDER denying 49 Plaintiff's 2nd Motion Ex Parte for Inadequate Access to the Courts and Overruling Plaintiff's Objections to Magistrate's Submitting the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter C. Lewis on 6/20/11. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(lmt)(jrd) |
Filing 53 ORDER denying 11 , 20 Motions to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter C. Lewis on 5/5/11. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(lmt)(jrd) |
Filing 42 ORDER (1) submitting 27 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Strike First Amended Complaint; (2) denying as moot 37 Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for Extension of Time to Prepare Response; and (3) denying 41 Plaintiff's Motion for Access to the Courts: The Motion to Dismiss is submitted on the papers and the hearing date of 2/25/11 is vacated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter C. Lewis on 2/23/11. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(lmt) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.