Dewoody v. Grounds

Petitioner: Charles T Dewoody
Respondent: Randy Grounds
Case Number: 3:2010cv01820
Filed: August 31, 2010
Court: California Southern District Court
Office: San Diego Office
County: Santa Cruz
Presiding Judge: John A. Houston
Referring Judge: Peter C. Lewis
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 19, 2010 3 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER Requiring requiring response to Petition (28 USC 2254). Motion to Dismiss due 11/29/10, Ppposition to Motion due 12/20/10, OR Answer by Respondent due 12/13/2010, Traverse by Petitioner due 1/13/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter C. Lewis on 10/19/10.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dewoody v. Grounds
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Charles T Dewoody
Represented By: Katera Estrada Rutledge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Randy Grounds
Represented By: Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?