-WMC Castillo v. John Skoba et al
| John Skoba, Margaret Padilla, R.K. Arnold and John Doe |
| Paul R Castillo |
| 3:2010cv01838 |
| September 3, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Barry Ted Moskowitz |
| William McCurine |
| Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
ORDER Re 19 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's Federal RICO claim is dismissed without leave to amend. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's remaining state claims. These claims are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 5/25/2011. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jer)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER Denying Motion for Relief from Order Lifting Injunction on Foreclosure Sale. The injunction enjoining foreclosure sale of the Plaintiff's home remains vacated. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 1/7/11. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jer) Modified on 1/10/2011 to correct file date (jer). (jrl).
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 17 Motion for Waiver of Security Payments. In light of the fact that Plaintiff's motion to waive the security deposit was received on October 14, 2010, the Court hereby revises its October 8 Order to allow first payment of Plaintiff's bond to be made on October 25, 2010. All other language in this Order is unchanged. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 10/21/10. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jer)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 8 Second Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Be Issued. It is ORDERED that Defendants and Defendants' officers, agents, employees, and those acting with knowledge of this Order be enjoined from selling the property known as 1924 Rees Road in San Marcos, California at foreclosure sale. This injunction shall remain in effect as long as Plaintiff posts monthly security payments in the regist ry of the Court. Defendants' failure to comply with this Order shall be treated as a contempt of court. Plaintiff shall forthwith provide notice of this order by serving all Defendants. Defendants are ordered to show cause, no later than October 22, 2010, why a preliminary injunction should not restrain sale until termination of this case. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 10/8/2010. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jer)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER denying 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and TRO: Plaintiff has failed to show he is likely to succeed on the merits and the Court denies his motion for a temporary restraining order. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 9/7/10. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(lmt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
