Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Southern District Patel et al v. Home Savings of America et al

Patel et al v. Home Savings of America et al

Plaintiff:	Sunil K. Patel and Daksha S. Patel
Defendant:	Home Savings of America, Aurora Loan Services, Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc., Residential Funding LLC and DOES
Case Number:	3:2010cv01845
Filed:	September 3, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office:	San Diego Office
County:	San Diego
Presiding Judge:	Michael M. Anello
Presiding Judge:	Barbara Lynn Major
Nature of Suit:	All Other Real Property
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By:	None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 25, 2011	Filing 31 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 23 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint. Plaintiffs' First Cause of Action for TILA violations: To the extent Plaintiffs' damages claim rests upon events regarding the orig ination of the loan, it is time-barred and therefore dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiffs' Fourth through Seventh Causes of Action have been voluntarily dismissed by Plaintiffs. As the operative claims are in place, the Court Orders RFC to file an answer to Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint within fourteen days from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 7/25/2011. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)
October 19, 2010	Filing 9 ORDER: Granting 4 Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Residential Funding LLC; Granting 5 Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Aurora Loan Services and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.; and Denying 8 Request to Amend filed by Pl aintiffs. It is hereby ordered that the Motions to Dismiss are granted without prejudice. Plaintiffs' Request for Leave to Amend is denied. If Plaintiffs choose to seek leave of Court to file an amended complaint, Plaintiffs shall do so in accordance with Local Civil Rule 7.1. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 10/19/2010. (leh)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 25, 2011

Filing 31 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 23 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint. Plaintiffs' First Cause of Action for TILA violations: To the extent Plaintiffs' damages claim rests upon events regarding the orig ination of the loan, it is time-barred and therefore dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiffs' Fourth through Seventh Causes of Action have been voluntarily dismissed by Plaintiffs. As the operative claims are in place, the Court Orders RFC to file an answer to Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint within fourteen days from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 7/25/2011. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)

October 19, 2010

Filing 9 ORDER: Granting 4 Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Residential Funding LLC; Granting 5 Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Aurora Loan Services and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.; and Denying 8 Request to Amend filed by Pl aintiffs. It is hereby ordered that the Motions to Dismiss are granted without prejudice. Plaintiffs' Request for Leave to Amend is denied. If Plaintiffs choose to seek leave of Court to file an amended complaint, Plaintiffs shall do so in accordance with Local Civil Rule 7.1. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 10/19/2010. (leh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Patel et al v. Home Savings of America et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sunil K. Patel
Represented By:	Jesse T. Farris
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daksha S. Patel
Represented By:	Jesse T. Farris
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Home Savings of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Aurora Loan Services
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Residential Funding LLC
Represented By:	Hassan Elrakabawy
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: DOES
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?