Shin v. Benihana Inc

Plaintiff: Jungryea Shin
Defendant: Benihana Inc
Case Number: 3:2010cv01862
Filed: September 7, 2010
Court: California Southern District Court
Office: San Diego Office
County: San Diego
Referring Judge: William V. Gallo
Presiding Judge: Marilyn L. Huff
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 1, 2012 33 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER: ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 30 Sanctions; and (2) dismissing with prejudice Plaintiff's Claims for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 11/1/12.(cge) (Main Document 33 replaced on 11/2/2012 - incorrect pdf image previously attached - typo in document title, NEF regenerated) (cge).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shin v. Benihana Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jungryea Shin
Represented By: Harold M Hewell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Benihana Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?