AG La Mesa LLC v. Lexington Insurance Company et al
| AG La Mesa LLC |
| Lexington Insurance Company and DOES |
| 3:2010cv01873 |
| September 8, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Irma E. Gonzalez |
| Bernard G. Skomal |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
ORDER AND JUDGMENT. Court grants Lexington Insurance Company's 23 MOTION for Order Confirming the Arbitration Decision and directs Clerk to enter judgment in Lexington's favor as to both of the causes of action. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 7/19/2012. (jah)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER granting Defendant's 8 Motion to Compel; denying 8 Motion to Dismiss; granting 8 Motion to Stay. Parties are to forthwith to submit to binding arbitration as to Pla's 2nd cause of action for breach of contract. Pla's 1st ca use of action for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing is not subject to binding arbitration. Court stays the litigation pending arbitration. Parties shall inform Court the status of the case by letter, on or before 90 days from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 1/3/2011. (jah). Modified on 1/4/2011 - Checked w/ Chambers for clarification re motions (jah).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
