Friery v. Martel

Friery v. Martel

Petitioner:	William Francis Friery
Respondent:	Michael Martel
Case Number:	3:2010cv01938
Filed:	September 16, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office:	San Diego Office
County:	Amador
Presiding Judge:	Jan M. Adler
Presiding Judge:	Dana M. Sabraw
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 21, 2010	Filing 10 ORDER: (1) Granting 5 Application to Proceed in forma pauperis; and (2) Dismissing case without prejudice and with leave to Amend. If Petitioner wishes to proceed with this case, he must, no later than November 23, 2010, file a First Amended Petition which cures the pleading deficiencies outlined in this Order. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 9/21/10. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(Copy of Order and First Amended Petition form mailed to Petitioner)(lao)
September 15, 2010	Filing 7 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/15/2010 ORDERING This court has not ruled on petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis; and this matter is TRANSFERRED to the Southern District of California. (Reader, L)[Transferred from California Eastern on 9/17/2010.]

Date Filed

Document Text

September 21, 2010

Filing 10 ORDER: (1) Granting 5 Application to Proceed in forma pauperis; and (2) Dismissing case without prejudice and with leave to Amend. If Petitioner wishes to proceed with this case, he must, no later than November 23, 2010, file a First Amended Petition which cures the pleading deficiencies outlined in this Order. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 9/21/10. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(Copy of Order and First Amended Petition form mailed to Petitioner)(lao)

September 15, 2010

Filing 7 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/15/2010 ORDERING This court has not ruled on petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis; and this matter is TRANSFERRED to the Southern District of California. (Reader, L)[Transferred from California Eastern on 9/17/2010.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Friery v. Martel
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: William Francis Friery
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Michael Martel
Represented By:	Attorney General
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?