Epps v. Grannis et al
| Omar Ernest Epps |
| N Grannis, Larry Small, T Ochoa, G J Janda, R Powell, B Lew, R Madden, M Carpio, M D Greenwood, G Hopper, B Bentley, I Pickett and W Meister |
| 3:2010cv01949 |
| September 17, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Imperial |
| Anthony J. Battaglia |
| Roger T. Benitez |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
139
ORDER Granting Defendants' 128 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 9/21/2013. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(knb)
|
|
Filing
133
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 121 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 8/19/2013. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(knb)
|
|
Filing
126
ORDER: Denying Plaintiff's 123 Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 7/24/2013. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(knb)(jrd)
|
|
Filing
124
ORDER: (1) Denying Defendants' 112 First Ex Parte Application to Correct the Court's Clerical Error; and (2) Denying Defendants' 117 Second Ex Parte Application to Correct the Court's Clerical Error. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 7/23/2013. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(knb)
|
|
Filing
116
ORDER Denying Defendant's 111 Ex Parte Application to Continue Time for Completing Discovery or Filing Dispositive Motions. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 7/15/2013. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(knb)
|
|
Filing
109
ORDER Disposing of Order to Shaw Cause, Dismissing Some Claims as Moot, and Amending Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 6/27/2013.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(knb)(jrd)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER: (1) Adopting in Part and Declining in Part 68 Report and Recommendation re 47 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 3/26/2012. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(knb)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER: (1) Adopting Report and Recommendation; (2) Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 9/20/2011.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(knb)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER: Adopting 59 Report and Recommendation; Denying Plaintiff's 20 Motion for TRO. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 8/22/2011. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(knb)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 20 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin on 7/26/2011. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(knh)(jrd)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER: (1) Granting Plaintiff's (Doc. 2 ) Motion To Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Imposing No Initial Partial Filing Fee And Garnishing Balance From Prisoner's Trust Account Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a), And (2) Directing U.S. Marsha l To Effect Service Of Complaint Pursuant To Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(c)(3) & 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(d). Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 12/21/2010. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service; Order electronically transmitted to Matthew Cate, Secretary CDCR.) (mdc) Modified on 12/23/2010 - IFP package prepared; NEF regenerated. (mdc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
