Lindfors v. Small et al
| Eric R Lindfors |
| S Rutledge, R Fregosa, F Rodriguez, G J Janda, E Garcia, R Davis, J Jimenez, A R Bettencourt, Joshua Rocha, Matthew Resler, J Manning, E Loya, G Trujillo, G Stratton, G Edwards, A Beltran, F Z Mata, Larry Small, Matthew Cate, J Tim Ochoa and A Adams |
| 3:2010cv02120 |
| July 29, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Los Angeles |
| Michael M. Anello |
| Mitchell D. Dembin |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
ORDER: Granting 15 Motion for Permission Under Civil Local Rule 15.1 for Removal of All Exhibits Attached to Prior Pleadings in Order that the Same May be Attached to the Amended Pleading Herein; Dismissing Certain Defendants; Dismissing Claims for Failing to State a Claim; and Directing USMS to Effect Service of Remaining Claims and Defendants Found in Second Amended Complaint. The Clerk of Court is directed to remove the Exhibits attached to Plaintiff'soriginal Complaint and re-attach t hese Exhibits to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. Defendants Ochoa, Janda, Trujillo, Stratton, Beltran, Davis, Jimenez, Bettencourt, Garcia, Rutledge, Rodriguez, Mata and Manning are Dismissed from this action. Plaintiff's Fourteenth A mendment due process claims, Eighth Amendment failure to protect claims, access to courts claim and religious claims are Dismissed for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. All claims against Defendants Small, Cate, Edwards and Adams are Dismissed for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 6/17/2011. (Pro Per Package Prepared) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER Granting 6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Granting 7 Motion for Removal of Exhibits and Request to attach Exhibits to First Amended Complaint. The case is dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which r elief may be granted. Plaintiff is granted 45 days from the date this order is filed to file an amended complaint. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 2/17/2011. (Order electronically transmitted to Matthew Cate, Secretary CDCR) (1983 Form Mailed to Plaintiff) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER: Denying 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; and Dismissing Action Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A. For the reasons stated herein, it is ordered that Plaintiff is granted 45 days from the date this Order is filed to either pay the e ntire filing fee or file a new Motion to Proceed IFP. It is further ordered that Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed without prejudice and Plaintiff is granted 45 days leave to file a First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 11/30/2010. (Blank IFP and Civil Rights Complaint Form Mailed to Plaintiff) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
