Johnson v. California Department of Corrections et al
| Anthony Rashad Johnson |
| California Department of Corrections, E. J. Pimental, Sergeant Kulodrovic and Sanchez, |
| 3:2010cv02184 |
| October 19, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Michael M. Anello |
| Anthony J. Battaglia |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER Granting 33 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint. For the reasons stated herein, the Court Grants Defendants' Motion and Dismisses this action without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is ordered to close the case file. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 3/13/2013. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER Granting 11 Motion to Amend the Complaint; Denying 14 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. The Clerk of the Court is directed to docket the Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint, attached to his Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin on 10/6/2011. (IFP Package Prepared) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER (1) Granting Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; (2) Sua Sponte Dismissing Defendant California Department of Corrections; (3) Directing US Marshal to Effect Service Upon Remaining Defendants. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 11/24/2010. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jer)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
