Anderson et al v. California, State of et al
| Lisa Anderson and Elise J. Anderson |
| California, State of, Carol J. Risley, Carlos Flores, Darlene Jean, Douglas Vaughn, Amber Dawes, Rueben Gonzales, Estella Gonzales, Febe Luna, Jesse Dose and Lordes Dose |
| 3:2010cv02216 |
| October 26, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Michael M. Anello |
| Anthony J. Battaglia |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| Americans with Disabilities Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ORDER: Granting 9 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Dismissing First Amended Complaint with Leave to Amend for Failure to State a Claim; and Denying as Moot 10 Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date this Order is Filed in which to file a Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 3/30/2011. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER denying 7 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with this action, she must pay the required $350 filing fee or submit an amended motion to proceed IFP that accurately identifies all of her monthly financial obligations and demonstrates that she lacks the resources to pay the cost of commencing this action by 1/10/2011. If Plaintiff does not pay the required filing fee or submit an amended motion to proceed IFP by the date stated, her case will be subject to dismissal. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 12/6/2010. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER: Denying 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Denying as Moot 3 Request for Appointment of Counsel. The Court cannot determine if Lisa is indigent within the meaning of the IFP statute and therefore Denies her motion to proceed IFP without prejudice. If Lisa wishes to proceed with this action, she must file an amended complaint and pay the $350 filing fee, or submit a renewed motion to proceed in forma pauperis, by 11/16/2010. If Plaintiff Elise intends to represent h erself in this action, she must file her own motion to proceed in forma pauperis and sign the amended complaint on her own behalf by 11/16/2010. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 10/27/2010. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
