Mathis v. Doyle

Mathis v. Doyle

Petitioner:	Bennie Lee Mathis
Respondent:	Robert Doyle
Case Number:	3:2010cv02287
Filed:	October 29, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office:	San Diego Office
County:	Imperial
Presiding Judge:	Jan M. Adler
Presiding Judge:	Michael M. Anello
Nature of Suit:	Mandamus and Other
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 12, 2010	Filing 3 ORDER: (1) Construing Action Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254; (2) Granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; (3) Dismissing Case Without Prejudice. Accordingly, the Court construes the instant action as a habeas petition brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Court grants Petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismisses the case without prejudice. To have this case reopened, Petitioner must file an amended petition by 12/13/2010. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Petitioner a blank First Amended Petition form. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 11/12/2010. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 12, 2010

Filing 3 ORDER: (1) Construing Action Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254; (2) Granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; (3) Dismissing Case Without Prejudice. Accordingly, the Court construes the instant action as a habeas petition brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Court grants Petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismisses the case without prejudice. To have this case reopened, Petitioner must file an amended petition by 12/13/2010. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Petitioner a blank First Amended Petition form. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 11/12/2010. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mathis v. Doyle
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Bennie Lee Mathis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Robert Doyle
Represented By:	U S Attorney CV
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?