Li v. Akal Security, Inc. et al
| Rong Dong Li |
| Akal Security, Inc., John Doe One, John Doe Two and DOES |
| 3:2010cv02465 |
| December 1, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Imperial |
| Larry Alan Burns |
| Bernard G. Skomal |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Akal's 12 Motion to Dismiss. Li must show cause, within 14 days of the date this Order is entered, why service of Defendants United States and Robin Baker was proper. If Li does not respond within 14 days, he will have failed to serve the Defendants in a timely manner under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) and the Court will dismiss his claims against them without prejudice. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 1/17/12. (kaj)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER Re: Motion to Amend Complaint 15 ; Insofar as the motion seeks to add Akal officers, it is denied; Insofar as the motion seeks to add the United States, ICE, and ICE officials, however, it is granted; Akal needn't re-file its motion to dismiss, which has been fully briefed and is under submission; Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 9/26/11. (kaj)(jrd)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER on Motion to Dismiss 4 . Plaintiff Li is allowed two weeks from the date this Order is entered to amend his complaint. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 4/3/11. (kaj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
