Chinmax Medical Systems Inc. v. Alere San Diego, Inc.

Petitioner: Chinmax Medical Systems Inc.
Respondent: Alere San Diego, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2010cv02467
Filed: December 1, 2010
Court: California Southern District Court
Office: San Diego Office
County: San Diego
Presiding Judge: William Q. Hayes
Referring Judge: Nita L. Stormes
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 09:0010
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 8, 2010 12 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER: Chinmax's (Doc. 3 ) Ex Parte Motion for Stay of an Interim Final Award Issued in Arbitration Pending This Court's Review of the Petition to Vacate that Arbitration Award is denied. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 12/8/2010. (mdc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chinmax Medical Systems Inc. v. Alere San Diego, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Chinmax Medical Systems Inc.
Represented By: Jose L Patino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Alere San Diego, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?