Bridgeman v. San Diego County et al
| Michael Dayne Bridgeman |
| San Diego County, San Diego County Sheriffs Dept., William B Kolender and William Gore |
| 3:2010cv02470 |
| December 2, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| William Q. Hayes |
| Bernard G. Skomal |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
ORDER (1) Granting Motion To Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2 ); (2) Denying Motion For Appointment Of Counsel (Doc. 7 ); And (2) Dismissing Complaint For Failing To State A Claim Pursuant To 28 U.S.C. Sections 1915(e)(2)(B) And 1915A(b): Plaintif f is granted 45 days leave from the date this Order is filed in which to file a First Amended Complaint which cures all the deficiencies of pleading noted. If Plaintiff fails to file an Amended Complaint within 45 days, this action shall remain dismissed without further Order by the Court. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 2/4/2011. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service; Order electronically transmitted to Matthew Cate, Secretary CDCR.) (mdc)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER OF TRANSFER. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 11/30/10. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2010) [Transferred from California Northern on 12/2/2010.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
