Chavarria v. Schwarzenegger et al
| Ruben Chavarria |
| Arnold Schwarzenegger, Jerry Brown, Matthew Cate, M D Biter and Camilla Harris |
| 3:2011cv00008 |
| January 3, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Kern |
| Ruben B. Brooks |
| Irma E. Gonzalez |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER (1) ADOPTING 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; granting 11 Motion to Dismiss; and denying and dismissing petition for habeas corpus: Certificate of Appealability denied. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 11/8/11.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(lmt)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER (1) granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and (2) Dismissing Petition without Prejudice: the Court grants Petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismisses the Petition without prejudice due to Petitione r's failure to name a proper respondent and allege exhaustion as to state judicial remedies. To have this case reopened, Petitioner must file a First Amended Petition no later than 3/15/11 in conformance with this Order. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Petitioner a blank First Amended Petitionalong with a copy of this Order. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 1/7/11. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service; form sent)(lmt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
