Martin v. County of San Diego et al
| Drew Martin |
| County of San Diego, Stephanie Buchert, Hardy, Nunez and Does 1 - 20, inclusive |
| 3:2011cv00091 |
| January 18, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Michael M. Anello |
| Ruben B. Brooks |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
ORDER Granting Defendants' Unopposed Motions for Summary Judgment (Docs. 38 , 46 ). Based on the information stated herein, the Court Grants Defendants Stephanie Buchert, William Hardy, and San Diego County's motions for summary judgment. This order disposes of all remaining claims. The Clerk of Court is instructed to enter judgment accordingly and terminate the case. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 3/6/2012. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER granting 35 Plaintiff's Counsel's Motion to be relieved as Counsel of Record. Attorney Keith Howard Rutman terminated in case as to Plaintiff Drew Martin. The Court advises Plaintiff that he is now proceeding in this matter pro se and must provide the Court with his current contact information, including mailing address. Plaintiff's counsel shall provide Plaintiff with copies of any documents in his possession that Plaintiff may need to litigate his case, as well as a copy of this Order and the Court's Order Providing Notice to Pro Se Prisoner of Requirements for Opposing Summary Judgment, to be issued contemporaneously herewith. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 1/10/12. (lao)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 5 Motion to Dismiss. Based on the foregoing stated herein, Defendant Stephanie Buchert, M.D.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's claims against her is granted in part and the Court hereby dismisses w ith prejudice Plaintiff's first, second, third, fourth, and eighth claims against Defendant Buchert, as well as Plaintiff's claim for punitive damages. The motion is dnied in part and the Court retains supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's sixth and seventh claims against Defendant Buchert. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 5/10/2011. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh) Modified on 5/10/2011 (amk).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
