Manzo v. Mani et al
Ezequiel Manzo |
Mani, Garcia, Federal Board of Prisons Health Care Services and Federal Board of Prisons |
3:2011cv00123 |
January 20, 2011 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Irma E. Gonzalez |
Bernard G. Skomal |
Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER granting Plaintiff's 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Warden of Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) to collect the $6.17 initial partial filing fee assessed by this Order and forward to Clerk of Court, if those f unds are available at the time this Order is executed. Warden of MCC to collect from Pla's prison trust acct the balance of the $350 filing fee by collecting monthly payments in an amount equal to 20% of the preceding month's inc ome credited to the acct and forward to Clerk of Court each time the amount in the acct exceeds $10 in accordance w/ 28 USC 1915(b)(2). Pla's Complaint is dismissed w/o prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b). Pla is granted 45 days leave from the date of this Order to file a First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 3/10/2011. (cc: MCC) (Blank First Amended 1983 Complaint form t/w copy if this Order mailed to Plaintiff)(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jah) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.