Pullman v. Schwarzenegger et al
| Keith Pullman |
| Michael Wells, Ronilee Clark, Susan McLaughlin, James Collins, Tara Lynch, DOES, Ruth Coleman, Kathy Dice, Mark Jorgensen, Arnold Schwarzenegger and Michael Chrisman |
| 3:2011cv00202 |
| January 31, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Barbara Lynn Major |
| Janis L. Sammartino |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER Granting 15 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's sole federal claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is Dismissed without prejudice. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3), the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintif f's remaining state law claims, and thus those claims are also Dismissed without prejudice. The Court will afford Plaintiff one last opportunity to amend his complaint to state a cognizable federal claim. If Plaintiff wishes to do so, an Amended Complaint must be filed addressing all of the deficiencies noted by the Court within 15 days. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 7/16/2012. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER: (1) granting Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice; (2) granting in part 3 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss: This Order dismisses the sole federal claim in this case, and the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's state law claims. If Plaintiff is not able to state a cognizable claim under Section 1983, the Court will remand the remainder of his claims to state court. If Plaintiff wishes to continue litigating this case in federal court, he must file an amended complaint addressing these deficiencies within 30 days of the date that this Order is electronically docketed. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 12/20/11. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(lmt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
