Alvarado Orthopedic Research, L.P. et al v. Linvatec Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Alvarado Orthopedic Research, L.P. and Kenneth H. Holko
Defendant: Linvatec Corporation and DOES
Case Number: 3:2011cv00246
Filed: February 4, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: San Diego
Presiding Judge: Ruben B. Brooks
Presiding Judge: Irma E. Gonzalez
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 24, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 123 ORDER denying Defendant's 96 Motion for Summary Judgment. Court denies Dft's Motion for Summary Judgment and Request for Sanctions in its entirety. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 5/24/2013. (jah)
December 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 83 ORDER denying Linvatec Corporation's 70 Ex Parte Motion to Revise Certain Dates in the Scheduling Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks on 12/12/2012. (jah)
February 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiffs' 26 Motion to Dismiss First Amended Counterclaims. Court dismisses w/ prejudice Linvatec's counterclaim for unjust enrichment as to Plaintiff Holko, dismisses w/o prejudice Linvatec� 39;s counterclaim for breach of contract as to Plaintiff Holko, dismisses w/o prejudice Linvatec's counterclaim for negligent misrepresentation as to Plaintiff Alvarado, and denies as moot Plaintiffs' motion to dismiss Linvatec's count erclaim for breach of covenent of good faith anf fair dealing as to Plaintiff Holko. Court declines to dismiss Linvatec's counterclaims for accounting, declaratory judgment and negligent misrepresentation as to Plaintiff Holko. Defendants may amend their counterclaims within 21 calendar days from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 2/8/2012. (jah)
August 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER Granting Defendant's 8 Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 8/23/2011. (knb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alvarado Orthopedic Research, L.P. et al v. Linvatec Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Linvatec Corporation
Represented By: Ellen Kimatian Eagen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alvarado Orthopedic Research, L.P.
Represented By: Alan Kipp Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth H. Holko
Represented By: Alan Kipp Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?