Thornton v. Oliver
| William Cecil Thornton |
| Euketa Oliver, Micheal Stainer and Kamala Harris |
| 3:2011cv00338 |
| February 17, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Kern |
| Irma E. Gonzalez |
| Louisa S Porter |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [Doc. No. 75 ] and denying Second Amended Petition [Doc. No. 42 ]. Certificate of Appealability denied. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 09/4/2012.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(yeb)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER denying 66 Petitioner's Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Louisa S Porter on 12/20/11. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(lmt)(jrd)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER directing California Correctional Training Facility Officials and Warden to Comply with California code of regulations re 31 Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Louisa S Porter on 10/31/11. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(copy of Order mailed to Warden Randy Grounds, California Correctional Training Facility)(lao)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER denying without prejudice 7 Motion for Order of Unlimited Pro-Per Privileges and No Photocopying Limit. Signed by Magistrate Judge Louisa S Porter on 3/30/11. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rlu)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
