Bridgeman v. Records Clerk et al
| Michael Dayne Bridgeman |
| Records Clerk, Trust Account Clerk and George A Neotti |
| 3:2011cv00390 |
| February 23, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Irma E. Gonzalez |
| Barbara Lynn Major |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
3
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Secy of the CA Dept of Corrections and Rehabilitation shall collect from Pla's prison trust acct the $350 balance of the filing fee owed by collecting monthl y payments from the acct equal to 20% of the preceding month's income and forward payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amt exceeds $10 in accordance w/ 28 USC 1915(b)(2). Pla's Complaint is dismissed w/o prejudice purs uant to 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(b) and 1915A(b). Pla is granted 30 days leave from the date this Order is filed to file a First Amended Complaint. If Pla's Amended Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, it may be dismissed w/o further leave to amend and may be counted as a strike under 28 USC 1915(g). Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 3/22/2011. (Order electronically transmitted to Matthew Cate, Secretary CDCR) (Blank First Amended 1983 Complaint form and copy of this Order mailed to Plaintiff) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
