Evans v. San Diego, City of et al
Jasmine Evans |
San Diego Police Department, Brandon Gaines, Michael Serrano, Officer Weiss, Officer Navarro, San Diego, City of and DOES |
3:2011cv00396 |
February 25, 2011 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Michael M. Anello |
William McCurine |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 59 ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 38 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons stated herein, the Court: 1. Grants Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff's second cause of action under 42 U.S. C. Section 1983 regarding "false arrest"; 2. Denies Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff's first cause of action under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 regarding "excessive use of force"; 3. Grants Defendants 39; Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff's third cause of action under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 regarding "unlawful policies, customs, or habits"; 4. Denies Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff's fourt h cause of action for assault and battery; and 5. Grants Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff's fifth cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 12/19/2012. (leh)(jrd) |
Filing 30 AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER - Granting 14 Joint Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge William McCurine, Jr on 4/19/2012. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh) |
Filing 26 ORDER Ruling Re: Discoverable Documents of Defendant Police Officers Following In Camera Review: In accordance with the Court's findings, Defendants are ordered to produce the following documents pursuant to protective order: 1) All defendant of ficers' Employee Evaluations; 2) All defendant officers' Employee Performance Reports; 3) All certificates showing the defendant officers' completion of participation in any course or seminar related to police work; 4) All documents sh owing the proficiency training of each defendant officer; 5) The Employee Performance Plans for each defendant officer; 6) Certificates of attendance for each defendant officer; and 7) The complete Internal Affairs Investigation of the subject incident. Signed by Magistrate Judge William McCurine, Jr on 4/3/2012.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.