Hamby v. Power Toyota Irvine et al
| Chad H. Hamby |
| DOES and Power Toyota Irvine |
| Irvine Imports, Inc. |
| Chad H. Hamby |
| 3:2011cv00544 |
| March 18, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Barry Ted Moskowitz |
| Bernard G. Skomal |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Defendants Motion to Compel arbitration is Granted. Judgment is entered compelling arbitration. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ecs)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER re 9 Ex Parte Application for Discovery and Stay of 7 Moton to Compel Arbitration. Plaintiff's ex parte application is Granted. Plaintiff may conduct discovery on the issue of unconscionability, and the hearing date for the motion to compel arbitration is taken off calendar. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 7/18/11. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ecs)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER Re Hearing Dates. The Court the hearing date for the motion to compel arbitration is continued to July 22, 2011 at 11:00 a.m., and the hearing date on Plaintiff's ex parte application is continued to June 17, 2011, so that the Court may first decide the motion to remand. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 5/16/2011.(jer)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
