McCoy v. Hedgpath

McCoy v. Hedgpath

Petitioner:	Kavin W McCoy
Respondent:	Anthony Hedgpath
Case Number:	3:2011cv00653
Filed:	March 30, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office:	San Diego Office
County:	Monterey
Presiding Judge:	Michael M. Anello
Presiding Judge:	William V. Gallo
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 6, 2012	Filing 33 ORDER: Adopting in its Entirety 29 Report and Recommendation; Overruling 32 Objections to Report and Recommendation; Dismissing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus with Prejudice; and Declining to Issue Certificate of Appealability. Based on the information stated herein, the Court concludes that the magistrate judge issued an accurate report and well-reasoned recommendation that the instant petition be dismissed. The Court Adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety and Dismiss es the petition for writ of habeas corpus with prejudice. Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Accordingly, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 1/6/2012. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)
June 6, 2011	Filing 26 ORDER Denying Motion For Appointment of Counsel re Doc. 24 MOTION filed by Kavin W McCoy. Petitioner filed Document 24 and stated therein for an Attorney to be appointed for him, the Court construes the document to be a motion for appointment of counsel. For the reasons stated within this Order, the "interests of justice" in this matter do not compel the appointment of counsel. Accordingly, Petitioner's Request for Appointment of Counsel is denied without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo on 6/6/2011.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 6, 2012

Filing 33 ORDER: Adopting in its Entirety 29 Report and Recommendation; Overruling 32 Objections to Report and Recommendation; Dismissing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus with Prejudice; and Declining to Issue Certificate of Appealability. Based on the information stated herein, the Court concludes that the magistrate judge issued an accurate report and well-reasoned recommendation that the instant petition be dismissed. The Court Adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety and Dismiss es the petition for writ of habeas corpus with prejudice. Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Accordingly, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 1/6/2012. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)

June 6, 2011

Filing 26 ORDER Denying Motion For Appointment of Counsel re Doc. 24 MOTION filed by Kavin W McCoy. Petitioner filed Document 24 and stated therein for an Attorney to be appointed for him, the Court construes the document to be a motion for appointment of counsel. For the reasons stated within this Order, the "interests of justice" in this matter do not compel the appointment of counsel. Accordingly, Petitioner's Request for Appointment of Counsel is denied without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo on 6/6/2011.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McCoy v. Hedgpath
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Kavin W McCoy
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Anthony Hedgpath
Represented By:	Attorney General
Represented By:	Stephanie H. Chow
Represented By:	Emily R. Hanks
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?