Profitstreams, LLC v. Ameranth, Inc

Profitstreams, LLC v. Ameranth, Inc

Petitioner:	Profitstreams, LLC
Respondent:	Ameranth, Inc
Case Number:	3:2011cv00766
Filed:	April 13, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office:	San Diego Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	Jan M. Adler
Presiding Judge:	Michael M. Anello
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By:	Defendant

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 27, 2011	Filing 27 ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 1 Petition to Compel Arbitration. The Court hereby Orders the parties to arbitration, through a mutually agreeable service provider, to resolve the issues in accordance with their Agreement. Accordingly, t he Court grants Profitstreams' petition to compel arbitration in part with respect to the four enumerated issues, but denies the petition in part with respect to any other issues not currently before this Court. Also, the Court cannot appoint the AAA to arbitrate the parties' dispute. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 9/27/2011. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh) (jrl).
August 17, 2011	Filing 23 ORDER denying 6 Motion for More Definite Statement, or in the Alternative, to Dismiss for failure to state a claim. It is further ordered that Ameranth shall file their Response in Opposition to the Petition by 9/6/2011, Replies shall be filed by 9/19/2011. The Hearing on the Petition to Compel Arbitration is set for 9/26/2011 at 2:30 PM in Courtroom 05. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 8/17/2011. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 27, 2011

Filing 27 ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 1 Petition to Compel Arbitration. The Court hereby Orders the parties to arbitration, through a mutually agreeable service provider, to resolve the issues in accordance with their Agreement. Accordingly, t he Court grants Profitstreams' petition to compel arbitration in part with respect to the four enumerated issues, but denies the petition in part with respect to any other issues not currently before this Court. Also, the Court cannot appoint the AAA to arbitrate the parties' dispute. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 9/27/2011. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh) (jrl).

August 17, 2011

Filing 23 ORDER denying 6 Motion for More Definite Statement, or in the Alternative, to Dismiss for failure to state a claim. It is further ordered that Ameranth shall file their Response in Opposition to the Petition by 9/6/2011, Replies shall be filed by 9/19/2011. The Hearing on the Petition to Compel Arbitration is set for 9/26/2011 at 2:30 PM in Courtroom 05. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 8/17/2011. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Profitstreams, LLC v. Ameranth, Inc
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Profitstreams, LLC
Represented By:	Chad T. Nitta
Represented By:	Blair Elizabeth Kanis
Represented By:	Stephen P Swinton
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Ameranth, Inc
Represented By:	William J Caldarelli
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?