Stonebreaker v. Guardian Life Insurance Company of America et al
| Pamela Stonebreaker |
| Guardian Life Insurance Company of America, Western Reserve Life Assurance Company of Ohio, Union Security Insurance Company, DOES, Kristin Stonebreaker, Kelli Stonebreaker and Ryan Stonebreaker |
| Western Reserve Life Assurance Company of Ohio |
| ROE ONE and ROES 2-10 |
| Western Reserve Life Assurance Company of Ohio, Union Security Insurance Company and Guardian Life Insurance Company of America |
| Pamela Stonebreaker |
| Union Security Insurance Company and Guardian Life Insurance Company of America |
| DOES, Kristin Stonebreaker, Kelli Stonebreaker and Ryan Stonebreaker |
| 3:2011cv00797 |
| April 15, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| William V. Gallo |
| William Q. Hayes |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
316
ORDER REGARDING JOINT DEFENSE PRIVILEGE: On or before 10/18/2012, Guardian shall produce to Plaintiff all communications between Guardian, Defendant Western Reserve Life Insurance Company of Ohio, and Defendant Union Security Insurance Company regard ing this case, dated before 4/6/2011 and dated after 7/23/2012. On or before 10/18/2012, Guardian shall produce to Plaintiff a privilege log for all communications between Guardian, Defendant Western Reserve Life Insurance Company of Ohio, and Defend ant Union Security Insurance Company regarding this case, dated from 4/6/2011 to 7/23/2012, that contains the information noted in the Court's 8/2/2012 Order, and noted in this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo on 10/4/2012. (mdc)(jrd)
|
|
Filing
315
ORDER: The Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 256 ) filed by Defendant Guardian is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Motion for Summary Judgment on Guardian's Lapse Defense (Doc. 267 ) filed by Plaintiff Pamela Stonebreaker is DENIED on the grounds that Guardian has not asserted a lapse defense to dispute coverage. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 9/21/2012. (mdc)
|
|
Filing
213
ORDER: The (Doc. 89 ) Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Western Reserve and the (Doc. 140 ) Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Union Security are denied. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 2/23/2012. (mdc)
|
|
Filing
205
ORDER Granting Defendant Union Security's Applications To Compel: The Deposition Of Pamela Stonebreaker, Production Of Documents. Signed by Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo on 2/3/2012. (mdc)
|
|
Filing
138
ORDER: The (Doc. 46 ) Ex Parte Motion for an Order for Continuance of the Motion for Summary Judgment Pending Discovery filed by Defendant Union Security Insurance Company; the (Doc. 78 ) Ex Parte Motion to Reschedule the Motion for Summary Judgmen t filed by Plaintiff; the (Doc. 92 ) Ex Parte Motion to Stay the Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion for Judgment in Interpleader filed by Plaintiff; and the (Doc. 129 ) Amended Ex Parte Motion to Continue Hearing and Stay filed by Western Reser ve are denied. Any opposition to Plaintiff's (Doc. 37 ) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Plaintiff claim of breach of contract; Western Reserve's (Doc. 88 ) Motion for Judgment in Interpleader and (Doc. 89 ) Motion for Summary Judg ment; Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment on Defendant Guardian's Counterclaim and Cross-claim (Doc. 116 ), Defendant Western Reserve's Counterclaim and Cross-claim (Doc. 117 ), and Defendant Union Securities Counterclaim and Cro ss-claim (Docs. # 118 , 122 ) shall be filed no more than twenty-one days from the date of this Order. If any party is not able to present facts essential to justify its opposition, the party may show by affidavit or declaration the specific reasons why it cannot pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(d). Any reply must be filed no later than fourteen days after the date that the opposition was filed. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 11/4/2011. (mdc)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER Denying Ex Parte Motion For Appointment Of Guardian Ad Litem (Re Doc. 29 ): The Court denies Ms. Blach-Villnow's Ex Parte Motion For Appointment of Guardian Ad Litem, sustains Guardian Life's objection to the appointment of Ms. Blach-Villnow, and rejects Guardian Life's proposal that David Stonebreaker serve as Guardian Ad Litem. Signed by Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo on 6/23/2011. (mdc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
