Harrera-Roman v. Harris, et al
| David Harrera-Roman |
| Name Unknown 2, United States District Court, Name Unknown 1 and Mark K Hansen |
| 3:2011cv00840 |
| April 20, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Michael M. Anello |
| Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
ORDER Denying 54 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice; and Directing US Marshal to Effect Service of Second Amended Complaint. The Court hereby Instructs the United States Attorney's Office to provide the US Marshal, in a con fidential memorandum, with the information necessary to personally serve Defendants. Following the receipt of any available information for Defendants, the Court Directs the US Marshal to serve a copy of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint an d Summons upon Defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i)(3). Defendants' addresses should not appear on the U.S. Marshal Form 285s. The Court further Directs the US Marshal to serve the United States pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i)(1). Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 5/22/2013. (Pro Per Package Prepared)(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER Finding as Moot 49 Report and Recommendation of US Magistrate Judge; and Finding as Moot 29 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend First Amended Complaint. It is hereby ordered that Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff' s Second Amended Complaint by 3/29/2013. Defense Counsel is instructed to contact the Chambers of Judge Anello to obtain a Hearing Date prior to filing a Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 3/11/2013. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER: Granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Granting 4 Motion to Amend the Complaint; and Sua Sponte Dismissing Complaint for Failing to State a Claim. It is hereby ordered that Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed IFP is grant ed. Defendant United States District Court is dismissed from this action. Plaintiff's Complaint is Dismissed without Prejudice for failing to state a claim. Plaintiff is granted 45 days leave to file a First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 7/19/2011. (cc: GEO Warden) (1983 Complaint Form Mailed to Plaintiff) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
