Lino v. Moskowitz et al
Petitioner: Owen Lino
Respondent: B Moskowitz and United States District Court, Southern District of California
Case Number: 3:2011cv00855
Filed: April 18, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: Kern
Presiding Judge: Ruben B. Brooks
Presiding Judge: Dana M. Sabraw
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 12, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER denying 11 Motion for Reconsideration from Court's Order and Judgment; denying 12 Motion for Transcripts as moot. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 11 ) is hereby DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion for Cou rt's Order to Clerk for Case Transcripts and Motion to Proceed IFP on Appeal (ECF No. 12 ) is hereby DENIED as moot. The Court further CERTIFIES that an IFP appeal from this Order would be frivolous and therefore, would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 10/12/2011. (USCA Case Number 11-56369. Order electronically transmitted to US Court of Appeals. All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (akr)
May 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER dismissing civil action: (1) for failing to pay the $350 filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. 1914(a) and/or failing to move to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a); (2) as frivolous and without leave to amend pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1); and (3) Denying request for leave or Court Order to Amend/Supplement 3 as Moot. The Court hereby certifies that an IFP appeal from this Order would also be frivolous and therefore, would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a (3). Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 5/23/11. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(lao)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lino v. Moskowitz et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: B Moskowitz
Represented By: U S Attorney CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States District Court, Southern District of California
Represented By: U S Attorney CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Owen Lino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?