Rosales v. FitFlop USA, LLC
| Arianna Rosales |
| FitFlop USA, LLC |
| 3:2011cv00973 |
| May 4, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| William V. Gallo |
| Thomas J. Whelan |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
133
ORDER granting 132 Motion CLASS MEMBERS MOTION TO SUBMIT PERSONAL CLAIM FORM. Signed by Judge Thomas J. Whelan on 7/18/2014. (av1)
|
|
Filing
130
ORDER denying 123 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis on Appeal. Signed by Judge Thomas J. Whelan on 7/3/2014. (USCA Case Number 14-55880. Order electronically transmitted to the US Court of Appeals. All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (akr)
|
|
Filing
121
ORDER granting 114 Joint Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement. Court approves the settlement as fair, reasonable and adequate to the Class. Court overrules Mr. Narkin's 119 objections to the settlement, Court approves the � 36;5,000 service award to Plaintiff Arnold, the $1,500 service awards to Ms. Glaberson and Ms. Ojeda, and Class Counsel's request for $1.325 million in attys' fees and $180,000 in expenses. Signed by Judge Thomas J. Whelan on 4/28/2014. (jah)
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER Granting In Part and Denying In Part 64 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Thomas J. Whelan on 6/17/2013. (srm)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER denying without Prejudice Various Motions to File Portions of Joint Motions and Various Exhibits Under Seal 37 , 45 , 50 , 54 , 70 ; Order to Show Cause. Defendant shall have 30 days from the date this Order is filed to show good cause for sealing each redaction in the related Joint Motions and for sealing each of the "confidential" exhibits attached to those Joint Motions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford on 3/29/2013. (sjt)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER Granting In Part and Denying In Part 51 , 53 Joint Motion for Determination Discovery Dispute: Letters of Request to Conduct International Depositions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford on 3/11/2013. (srm)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER Re Joint Motion for Determination of Discovery Dispute 40 . It is hereby ordered that defendant's request for an order compelling plaintiff Charlice Arnold to provide a further response to defendant's Document Request No. 1 is granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford on 12/19/12. (kaj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rosales v. FitFlop USA, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Arianna Rosales | |
| Represented By: | Thomas Joseph O'Reardon, II |
| Represented By: | Timothy Gordon Blood |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: FitFlop USA, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Laura J McKay |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
