Tschudy v. J.C. Penny Corporation, Inc. et al
Raymond Tschudy |
J.C. Penny Corporation, Inc. and DOES |
3:2011cv01011 |
May 9, 2011 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
Jeffrey T. Miller |
Other Labor Litigation |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 200 ORDER Granting Motion for Partial Summary Judgment In Favor of Defendant and Against Plaintiffs; Scheduling Order (ECF No. 194 , 193 ). The court also sets a case management conference for 4/25/2016 at 9:30 AM. Five court days prior to the hearing, the parties shall file and serve a joint case management plan for resolving all remaining issues. The parties should also be prepared to set the final Pretrial Conference and Trial dates for any outstanding issues. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 3/30/2016. (rlu) |
Filing 183 ORDER Granting 176 Motion to Decertify Class; Scheduling Status Conference for 12/15/2015 at 1:30 PM before Judge Jeffrey T. Miller. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 12/9/2015. (rlu) |
Filing 129 ORDER Denying 93 Motion to Strike Class Allegations; Granting 119 Motion for Class Certification, and Denying Related Evidentiary Motions. Plaintiffs' counsel of record, Sheldon A. Ostroff, of the Law Offices of Sheldon A. Ostroff, and Ja mes C. Kostas, of Huffman & Kostas, are Appointed as Class Co-Counsel. The parties' evidentiary objections are overruled, and their motions to strike evidence related to the motions for class certification (Doc. Nos. 97 , 121 -1, and 124 ) are Denied. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 12/17/2014. (rlu) |
Filing 55 ORDER granting 50 Motion to Sever Illinois Plaintiffs and Transfer Venue of Illinois Plaintiffs' Claims. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 04/27/12. (cge) |
Filing 21 ORDER denying as moot Defendant's 8 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; granting Plaintiff's 13 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. the proposed First Amended Complaint is adopted as the operative complaint. Defendant shall have 21 days from the release of this Order to file any responsive pleadings. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 10/24/2011. (jah) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.