Gonzalez Garcia v. MCC Medical Staff et al
| Jose Gonzalez Garcia |
| US Border Patrol, INS and MCC Medical Staff |
| 3:2011cv01028 |
| May 10, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| John A. Houston |
| Louisa S Porter |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
4
ORDER (1) granting 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis imposing no initial partial filing fee and garnishing balance from prisoner's trust account; and (2) Dismissing complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 USC 1915(e)(2) and 1915(b). Plaintiff is granted 45 days leave to file a First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 07/15/11. (cc: Warden MCC) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp)
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice for failing to pay filing fee required by 28 USC 1914(a) and/or failing to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 USC 1915(a). Plaintiff is granted 45 days leave from the date this Order is filed to: (a) prep ay the entire $350 civil fee in full; or (b) complete and file a Motion to Proceed IFP. (blank motion to proceed in forma pauperis mailed to plaintiff). Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 05/17/11.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
