De Jourday v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
| Ozstar De Jourday |
| JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and DOES |
| 3:2011cv01052 |
| May 13, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Larry Alan Burns |
| Mitchell D. Dembin |
| Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER Denying Motion for an Extension of Time to Appeal. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 4/14/12.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(kaj)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER denying without prejudice plaintiff's 17 Request for an Extension of Time to Appeal. Within one week from the date this Order is entered, he must file a supplemental declaration, and a short brief if he chooses, that tells a more exact story of how he missed the 30-day window to file a notice of appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 3/15/12. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(kaj)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER granting defendant's 9 Motion to Dismiss. De Jourday has not alleged sufficient facts to support a RESPA violation, or to support his claim that the foreclosure on his home was wrongful. Both claims are therefore DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Necessarily, De Jourdays request for injunctive relief is DENIED. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 12/16/11. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(kaj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
