Sekerke v. Wallace et al
Plaintiff: Keith Wayne Sekerke
Defendant: E. Garcia, Peter Wallace, J. Garcia and R. Cobb
Case Number: 3:2011cv01978
Filed: August 19, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: Kern
Presiding Judge: John A. Houston
Presiding Judge: Nita L. Stormes
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting 8 Motion for Extension of Time to Re-File IFP Motion; granting 9 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; 11 Motion for Leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Secretary CDCR, or his designee, is ordered to collect from pr ison trust account the $350 balance of the filing fee owed in this case by collecting monthly payments from the trust account in an amount equal to 20% of the preceding month income credited to the account and forward payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 in accordance with 28 USC 1915(b)(2). Clerk shall issue a summons as to Pla's Complaint. US Marshal shall effect service of Complaint and summons upon Defendants Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 1/5/2012.(Order electronically transmitted to Matthew Cate, Secretary CDCR). (IFP Package prepared and sent to Plaintiff) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jah)
October 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER denying 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing case without prejudice pursuant to 28 USC 1915(a). Plaintiff is granted 45 days leave to either pay the entire $350 filing fee, or file a new Motion to Proceed IFP. (blank motion to proceed ifp mailed to plaintiff).. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 09/30/11. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp)(jrd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sekerke v. Wallace et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E. Garcia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Peter Wallace
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Garcia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R. Cobb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keith Wayne Sekerke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?