Gomez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
| Luz E. Gomez |
| All Persons Unknown, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation and DOES |
| 3:2011cv02251 |
| September 27, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Ruben B. Brooks |
| Barry Ted Moskowitz |
| Foreclosure |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER Granting 4 Motion to Dismiss as to federal claims and Denying Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Defendants motion to dismiss is Granted as to Plaintiffs FCRA and TILA claims. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint within 20 days of the filing of this Order. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 2/28/12. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ecs)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER Denying Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Lis Pendens and setting hearing on Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction is set for hearing on December 2, 2011 at 11:00 a.m. Defendants shall fil e an opposition to the motion for preliminary injunction on or before November 18, 2011. Plaintiff shall file her reply on or before November 28, 2011. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 10/31/11. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ecs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
