Dennis v. Hart et al
Ronald Dennis |
Pico Holdings, Inc., Carlos C. Campbell, Kenneth J. Slepicka, John R. Hart, Ronald Langley, Ronald G. Deuster, Richard D. Ruppert, Julie H. Sullivan and Kristina M. Leslie |
3:2011cv02271 |
September 30, 2011 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
William V. Gallo |
William Q. Hayes |
Securities/Commodities |
15 U.S.C. ยง 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 ORDER: The (Doc. 6 ) Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants John R. Hart, Ronald Langley, Ronald G. Deuster, Richard D. Ruppert, Julie H. Sullivan, Kristina M. Leslie, Carlos C. Campbell, Kenneth J. Slepicka, and Pico Holding, Inc. is granted in part . Plaintiff's claim for declaratory judgment that "the adverse May 13, 2011 advisory shareholder vote on the PICO Board's 2010 executive compensation rebutted the business judgment surrounding the PICO Board's decisions to increas e executive compensation in 2010" pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 78n-1 is dismissed. The (Doc. 7 ) Motion to Remand to State Court filed by Plaintiff Ronald Dennis, suing derivatively is granted in part. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1447(c), th is action is remanded to the California Superior Court for the County of San Diego, where it was originally filed and assigned Case No. 37-2011-00096377-CU-SL-CTL. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 1/6/2012. (Certified copy mailed to Calif. Superior Court, San Diego.) (mdc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.